Hey everyone, how's it going? I'm doing okay. I had originally planned to do a bunch of Christmas related posts this year, but with everything I have going on in my personal life right now, I was only able to manage to do the one Christmas movie review that I did on the 13th. However, today, I'm going to be reviewing all four Sherlock Holmes novels because I read them in the compilation, Sherlock Holmes: The Novels, which was published back in 2015. Let's get into it.
Sherlock Holmes: The Novels is a great way to read the four Sherlock Holmes novels written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, as all four are collected in a single tome. I got my copy about a month ago and I dove into it immediately as it had been over 20 years since I read a Sherlock Holmes story. All four novels were pretty good, however there's one that didn't grab me the way the other three did, and one that I enjoyed more than the others. I'll go into that more when I talk about each book.
As I mentioned in "My History with Sherlock Holmes", Sherlock Holmes is not a character that I'm overly familiar with, having only read one novel and one short story collection up until now. I've also only seen the 2009 movie adaptation. And being that this is the first time I've read of his adventures in over 20 years, I found it almost refreshing to read books that were written a 137 years ago, which I usually tend not to do with any other genre, preferring more modern books. But, being that I grew up with the Hardy Boys and Nancy Drew novels and a few mystery stuff on TV like Ghostwriter, I really wanted to get back into the book world of Sherlock Holmes. This book was the best way to do that since there are only four novels and over 60 short stories, collected in five collections.
While A Study in Scarlet was originally published in magazine form in December, 1887 and in book form in July, 1888, aside from the language, and era the book was written in, and is set in, it felt pretty modern in a way. Not in the way where there are cell phones, social media etc, but reading it didn't feel like I was reading a book that was 137-138 years old. I guess it's because once a year I go back to 19th Century London, England to watch Mickey's Christmas Carol and The Muppet Christmas Carol, so the time period isn't completely foreign to me as it might be for someone reading the book in the 2020s, who didn't grow up with either version of Charles Dickens's story.
What I enjoyed most about this book is seeing how Holmes and Watson met in the original source material, rather than how it's been adapted in movies and TV shows. Too often in modern storytelling the writer skips the origin story, especially if it's the origin story of a superhero that people have practically memorized at this point, and simply throw the characters into whatever situation they find themselves in in that particular story. So, to have the first novel in a series, being the first time two legendary characters meet is pretty cool.
I was fascinated by how the book was split into two parts, with most of the second part featuring the backstory of the victims of the murder case. In other stories I have found that distracting as it takes away from the main characters of the story, however in the Sherlock Holmes stories it works as Watson's backstory was taken care of in the first chapter of the book, and Holmes's backstory would be dealt with in the short stories rather than in the novels.
The Sign of Four, published in 1890, is the story I found to be the weakest of the four novels. Not that it was bad by any means, I just didn't find the mystery itself to be very engaging. I guess because I never quite understood the desire to kill for money or treasure.
However, the love story between Watson and Mary Morstan, the daughter of the late Captain Morstan, was great. Doyle took his time letting it evolve and grow as the story went on, and Holmes didn't interfere in the relationship though he did have some words on it when he found out about it. Romance was very different in the late 19th Century than it is today in the early 21st Century, so when two people get married at the end of a story set in, and written in, that time period things are going to seem faster than they happen today. It's also interesting that the romance didn't become the focus of the story while Holmes was working the case elsewhere.
The Hound of the Baskervilles, published in 1902, is my favourite of the four novels. Not just because I read it as a teenager and have history with the book. As far as the mystery is concerned, it's the most interesting one of the four novels. I think it's because of all four novels, the mystery in this book was the most difficult for me to deduce as I went along. With the other three, the mysteries were your standard Whodunnit with several immediate suspects. This one however had no real suspects that Watson, who was on the case by himself as Holmes had other responsibilities to take care of.
I find it interesting that Watson's wife, Mary, wasn't even mentioned in this book. I don't know if it's because something happened to her in one of the short stories or Doyle just didn't feel the need to mention her in the third and fourth novels. I just know that she's not in this book or the next one and Watson is back living at 221B Baker Street with Holmes. I might do a full review of this book in particular at some point in the future so I can go more into the story.
The Valley of Fear, published in 1915, was an interesting read. The structure of the novel was similar to A Study in Scarlet, however, the backstory of the people involved with the case that Holmes and Watson are working on in the story, takes up the entire second half of the novel, with a quick epilogue to wrap up the case for Holmes and Watson.
I think Doyle should've stuck to the structure of The Sign of Four and The Hound of Baskervilles. Not that we didn't need the information in that second half of the book, but I think that in this case it might've been a bit more efficient if Doyle had simply relayed the information through a letter sent to Holmes or a newspaper article or something to that effect. As he had in the previous two novels. I say that because I felt Holmes solving the mystery felt a bit rushed and I would've liked more time to see how he worked his process to come to the final solution.
However, while the character does not appear in the novel, The Valley of Fear is the first, and only, time that Holmes's archnemesis, Professor Moriarty, is mentioned in the novels. He first appeared in the short story, "The Final Problem", which was released in North America as "The Adventure of the Final Problem", published in 1893, and set after the events of this novel.
Overall though Sherlock Holmes: The Novels is well worth the read. Like I said, all four novels are completely collected, and being able to read all four of them finally is great. If you've never read Sherlock Holmes before, this is probably the best way to do it. There are also several collected editions of all of the short stories if you want to read those. But this is the best way to read all four novels.
I had such a great time reading the Sherlock Holmes novels. As I've said, not being overly familiar with Sherlock Holmes, I was very surprised at how accessible these books are as pieces of literature. And being that it's been over 20 years since I read The Hound of the Baskervilles, it was fun revisiting that particular book.
I think that's going to be it for me for 2025 my friends. I might post something next week, but this is it for my reviews for the year. I'm taking January off, but I will return in February. 2026 is going to be a year of change here at the Geek Cave, so I might not post as frequently come summertime. We'll see though. Right now though, I'm signing off from reviews for 2025. Have a great holiday season, no matter what you celebrate, and I will see you all in February. Take care.





.jpg)









%20%23572.jpg)
.jpg)






.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)